Here is the English translation:


Artificial Intelligence, Emotions and Sexuality

April 2026


Key Findings

This study conducted by Dedicated for XLoveCam aims to analyze the perceptions, uses, and attitudes of Belgians aged 18 and over toward artificial intelligence in intimate, emotional, and sexual contexts.

It highlights a still minority but very real adoption of AI in romantic or sexual uses, with significant differences depending on age, gender, and region. The results also show that AI generates as much curiosity as reluctance, particularly regarding human relationships, fidelity, loneliness, and the protection of vulnerable populations.


Have you ever used AI (chatbot, avatar, robot, etc.) in a romantic or sexual context?

Results

Total (N=1000)
Prefer not to answer: 1%
No, never: 74%
Yes, several times: 17%
Yes, once: 8%
👉 Total yes: 25%

Gender
Women (N=512): 1% prefer not to answer, 76% have never used AI in this context, 16% have used it several times and 7% once.
👉 Total yes: 23%

Men (N=488): 2% prefer not to answer, 71% have never used AI in this context, 17% have used it several times and 10% once.
👉 Total yes: 27%

Age
18–34 (N=261): 2% prefer not to answer, 57% have never used AI in this context, 27% have used it several times and 14% once.
👉 Total yes: 41%

35–54 (N=323): 1% prefer not to answer, 72% have never used AI in this context, 18% have used it several times and 9% once.
👉 Total yes: 27%

55+ (N=416): 1% prefer not to answer, 85% have never used AI in this context, 10% have used it several times and 4% once.
👉 Total yes: 14%

Region
Flanders (N=583): 1% prefer not to answer, 73% have never used AI in this context, 16% have used it several times and 10% once.
👉 Total yes: 26%

Brussels (N=104): 1% prefer not to answer, 66% have never used AI in this context, 21% have used it several times and 12% once.
👉 Total yes: 33%

Wallonia (N=313): 0% prefer not to answer, 77% have never used AI in this context, 18% have used it several times and 5% once.
👉 Total yes: 23%

Analysis

1. Still a minority practice

Adoption remains limited, but not marginal.

2. A strong generational effect

Young people are nearly three times more likely to use it than seniors.

3. Men slightly more likely to use it

The gap is moderate but real.

4. Interesting geographical differences

Urban areas appear more open.

5. Notable regular usage

This is not just occasional experimentation.


Would you be willing to engage in intimate or emotional exchanges with an AI?

Results

Total (N=1000)
No: 66%
Yes, but cautiously: 27%
Yes, without hesitation: 7%
👉 Total yes: 34%

Gender
Women (N=512): 72% no, 23% yes but cautiously, 5% yes without hesitation.
👉 Total yes: 28%

Men (N=488): 61% no, 31% yes but cautiously, 8% yes without hesitation.
👉 Total yes: 39%

Age
18–34 (N=261): 54% no, 34% yes but cautiously, 12% yes without hesitation.
👉 Total yes: 46%

35–54 (N=323): 65% no, 27% yes but cautiously, 8% yes without hesitation.
👉 Total yes: 35%

55+ (N=416): 76% no, 22% yes but cautiously, 2% yes without hesitation.
👉 Total yes: 24%

Region
Flanders: 36% yes
Brussels: 31% yes
Wallonia: 28% yes

Analysis

1. Strong overall reluctance

Most respondents reject the idea of intimate or emotional exchanges with AI.

2. Clear gender gap

Men appear more receptive in the short term.

3. Age as a key factor

Openness clearly declines with age.


Do you think AI can create a genuine sense of attachment or affection in a person?

Results

Total (N=1000)
No opinion: 12%
Certainly not: 31%
Probably not: 19%
Probably: 30%
Certainly: 8%
👉 Yes: 38%
👉 No: 50%

Analysis

1. Overall skepticism

The idea is mostly rejected, but less strongly than direct interaction.

2. Gender reversal

Women project more emotionally.

3. Age is decisive

Younger generations normalize this more.


To what extent would you feel comfortable with AI playing a romantic or emotional role in your life?

Results

Total (N=1000)
Comfortable: 12%
Not comfortable: 79%

Analysis

👉 Rejection remains overwhelming.
👉 AI is still seen as a tool rather than an emotional partner.


Would you be willing to use AI for a sexual experience (e.g., personalized avatar, erotic conversation, robot)?

Results

Total (N=1000)
No: 78%
Yes: 22%

Analysis

👉 Usage remains minority, but a real niche exists.
👉 Men and younger people are the most open segments.


Do you think a sexual relationship with an AI (avatar or robot) could be considered a form of infidelity?

Results

Total (N=1000)
Yes: 52%
No: 48%

Analysis

👉 The topic is highly divisive, but a slight majority considers it a form of infidelity.
👉 Among 18–34-year-olds, this perception is particularly strong.


Would you feel comfortable if your partner used AI for sexual interactions?

Results

Total (N=1000)
No: 74%
Yes: 26%

Analysis

👉 Strong resistance, especially among women.
👉 AI use within a couple is still widely seen as problematic.


Do you think AI could improve intimate life (desire, exploration, self-confidence, etc.)?

Results

Total (N=1000)
Yes: 26%
No: 50%

Analysis

👉 Opinions remain mixed, with a relative majority unfavorable.
👉 Younger respondents are significantly more open to potential benefits.


Do you think developing emotional relationships with AI could increase feelings of loneliness?

Results

Total (N=1000)
Yes: 51%
No: 24%

Analysis

👉 Concern about increased loneliness is widespread.
👉 Particularly strong among younger respondents and in Brussels.


What are your main concerns regarding the use of AI in romantic or sexual contexts?

Results

Analysis

Concerns are primarily social, psychological, and relational. Respondents fear less the technology itself than its effects on human relationships, mental health, vulnerable populations, and couple dynamics.


A study conducted by Dedicated


TO BE CITED AS FOLLOWS:
"Dedicated study for XLoveCam conducted in April 2026 via a self-administered online survey among a representative sample of 1,000 Belgians aged 18 and over."